Automotive group's cease and desist letter down so, that penalty at SOS Children's Village e.V. is done: Seriousness by LG Munich doubts

A abgemahnter by the Competition Centre car company had to pay the penalty not to contest headquarters, but at the SOS Children's Village e.V. offered.

The Munich district court, this construct is not as conducive to the seriousness rejected Model. This agreement is in any event at the Hamburg rite (Amount of the penalty shall be subject to judicial review) so. Whether, however many times the required penalty would have been sufficient, remains unclear.

Other issues on intellectual property:

• No infringement of competition law by temporary workers without required permit
• Court settlements, in which a claim for injunctive relief is dubbed, can in principle pursuant to § 890 Abs. 1 ZPO be provided with a pronounceable by separate court order ordering means threat
• Designation “Ginger Beer” for a drink, contains no beer, can be misleading, and because the extent of the domestic average consumer as a reference beer(ingredients) is understood
• OLG keeps anticompetitive Wikipedia publication for Weihrauchpräperate
• TikTok music in advertising: Justify license damages in a comprehensible manner