INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY · HORAK RECHTSANWÄLTE
This also does not result from Art. 6 the recitals of the directive provide an indication of this, that this requires a basic price indication in the immediate vicinity of the total price. After 6. Recital carries the obligation, indicate the sales price and the unit price, made a noticeable contribution to improving consumer information, because they give consumers the best possible options in the simplest possible way…
Is also at a peak position promoting a burden of proof in favor of the plaintiff no reason, if he can demonstrate that relevant to the assessment of the Spit zenstellung facts without unreasonable difficulty and prove. JUDGMENT BGH I ZR 84/13 from 3. July 2014 – We pay top prices UWG § 5 Abs. 1 Sentence 2 No.. 2 Other topics for…
The mention of the protected name of music festivals during the Sweepstakes advertising does not constitute a trade mark infringement nor is it anti-competitive LG Frankfurt 10. Chamber for Commercial Matters, from 05.07.2013 to 3/10 The 42/13 Standardize: § 5 Abs 1 S 2 No. 4 UWG, § 14 Trademark, § 23 No. 2 MarkenG Other issues on intellectual property:Base price…
The specification of a premium rate service numbers in the imprint of a message the media service provider is anti-competitive. LG Frankfurt 3. Civil Appeal from the 02.10.2013 to 2-03 The 445/12, 2/03 The 445/12, 2-3 The 445/12, 2/3 The 445/12 Art 5 Abs 1 Buchst c EGRL 31/2001, § 66d TKG, § 5 Abs 1 No. 2 TMG, § 4 No. 11 UWG Other topics…
1. Court settlements, in which a claim for injunctive relief is dubbed, can in principle pursuant to § 890 Abs. 1 ZPO be provided with a pronounceable by separate court order ordering means threat (BGH, Decision of 2. 2. 2012, Wheat 2012, S. 957 ff.). 2. The Question, whether an agreed in a court settlement cease and desist with such an order means the threat…
§ 8 UWG elimination and omission (1) If you are looking for § 3 or § 7 makes illegal commercial act, can be at disposal and in danger of repetition made to cease and desist. The claim for injunctive relief already exists then, if such infringement § 3 or § 7 threatens. (2) Will the violations rolled into one…
KG Berlin 5. Civil Division 5 You 19/12 from 12.10.2012 – Ginger Beer motto 1. The term “Ginger Beer” for a drink, contains no beer, can be misleading, and because the extent of the domestic average consumer as a reference beer(ingredients) is understood. 2. To competitors, which has a claim for injunctive relief under unfair competition law against the user of such a designation…
A abgemahnter by the Competition Centre car company had to pay the penalty not to contest headquarters, but at the SOS Children's Village e.V. offered. The Munich district court, this construct is not as conducive to the seriousness rejected Model. This agreement is in any event at the Hamburg rite (Amount of the penalty shall be subject to judicial review) so. Further topics on the spiritual…
According to the judgment of the OLG Munich also provides a publication in an online reference a competition-related action therefore, and may be prohibited from a competitor: OLG 29. Civil Division, Judgment of 10.05.2012, 29 You 515/12 § 2 No. 1 UWG, § 3 UWG, § 4 No. 3 UWG, § 8 Abs 1 UWG, § 8 Abs…