INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY · HORAK RECHTSANWÄLTE
This also does not result from Art. 6 the recitals of the directive provide an indication of this, that this requires a basic price indication in the immediate vicinity of the total price. After 6. Recital carries the obligation, indicate the sales price and the unit price, made a noticeable contribution to improving consumer information, because they give consumers the best possible options in the simplest possible way…
1. Ein Textilerzeugnis, die als deutsche Textilfaserbezeichnung anstelle des Begriffs gem. Anhang I Nr. 26 zur TextilKennzVO “Polyacryl” the term “Acryl” or. “Acrylic” has, verstößt gegen das Kennzeichnungsgebot gem. Artt. 5 Abs. 1, 9 Abs. 1, 15 Abs. 3, 16 Abs. 1, Abs. 3 Textil-KennzVO. Dieser Verstoß ist auch geeignet, an appreciable effect for the…
URTEIL DES GERICHTSHOFS (Ninth Chamber) 4. June 2015(*) „Vorlage zur Vorabentscheidung – Richtlinie 2000/13/EG – Etikettierung und Aufmachung von Lebensmitteln – Art. 2 Abs. 1 For sure. a Ziff. i und Art. 3 Abs. 1 No.. 2 – Etikettierung, suitable, den Käufer über die Zusammensetzung der Lebensmittel irrezuführen – Verzeichnis der Zutaten – Verwendung…
The mention of the protected name of music festivals during the Sweepstakes advertising does not constitute a trade mark infringement nor is it anti-competitive LG Frankfurt 10. Chamber for Commercial Matters, from 05.07.2013 to 3/10 The 42/13 Standardize: § 5 Abs 1 S 2 No. 4 UWG, § 14 Trademark, § 23 No. 2 MarkenG Other issues on intellectual property:Base price…
The specification of a premium rate service numbers in the imprint of a message the media service provider is anti-competitive. LG Frankfurt 3. Civil Appeal from the 02.10.2013 to 2-03 The 445/12, 2/03 The 445/12, 2-3 The 445/12, 2/3 The 445/12 Art 5 Abs 1 Buchst c EGRL 31/2001, § 66d TKG, § 5 Abs 1 No. 2 TMG, § 4 No. 11 UWG Other topics…
JUDGMENT BGH VIII ZR 327/09 from 10. November 2010 Commercial Code § 89a If named in a commercial agency contract the violation of a contractually agreed-competition clause as an important reason for termination without notice, so this does not preclude contractual interpretation, after the competition violations, so insignificant taking all the circumstances, that they create a relationship of trust…