INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY · HORAK RECHTSANWÄLTE
Es stellt für sich allein keine unlautere Rufausnutzung dar, wenn eine fremde Marke in einem Internet-Verkaufsangebot im Rahmen einer vergleichenden Werbung verwendet wird, um Kunden, die sich einer Suchmaschine bedienen, auf das eigene Produkt aufmerksam zu machen. JUDGMENT BGH I ZR 167/13 from 2. April 2015 – Staubsaugerbeutel im Internet UWG § 6 Abs. 2…
“Bestpreisklauseln” antitrust law and therefore inadmissible By order of 09. January 2015 has 1. Antitrust Division of the Court of Dusseldorf, chaired by Prof. Dr. Jürgen Bold confirmed the view of the Federal Cartel, that between the HRS Hotel Reservation Service Robert Ragge GmbH (“HRS”) and agreed their contract hotels “Bestpreisklauseln” are contrary to competition law. Therefore, the Senate, the Board of…
A) One finding of the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices in accordance with § 21 Abs. 4 AMG on the admission requirement of a drug comes in the context of § 4 No.. 11 UWG offense effect to. B) The effect of an event (not trivial) Administrative act is eliminated not by, that this is challenged and the challenge has suspensive effect. JUDGMENT BGH I ZR…